Facebook Twitter Gplus Flickr LinkedIn YouTube E-mail RSS
Published on March 23, 2013, in Washington.

Senate Budget Committee chair Murray holds up a copy of a federal employees' Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification in WashingtonIn the early morning hours Saturday after almost 13 continuous hours of voting, the Senate passed a budget resolution for the first time in nearly four years.

The proposal, which Democratic drafters say will reduce the deficit by $1.85 trillion between spending cuts and tax increases, passed narrowly 50-49 on a largely partisan vote at 4:56 a.m.

A handful of Democrats, all up for reelection next year and representing conservative states, voted against the measure: Sens. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Mark Begich (D-Alaska). Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) was absent.

 
Published on March 20, 2013, in Washington.

prolifecatholic5Despite their pro-abortion views, Vice President Joe Biden and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi both received communion at the mass yesterday to celebrate the inauguration of newly-elected Pope Francis.

Biden’s office confirmed to the Washington Times that he had received communion and reporters in the White House presidential reporting pool confirmed in an email to LifeNews that Pelosi had received it as well. Pope Francis did not administer the sacrament.

Father Frank Pavone told the LifeNews he opposed the two pro-abortion politicos receiving communion since their pro-abortion views are outside the teachings of the Catholic Church.

The Priests for Life leader said, ““At a Mass during which our new Pope emphasized the duty public officials – and all the rest of us – have to protect the weakest among us, Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi have the audacity to receive Communion while publicly renouncing their responsibility to protect the weakest among us.”

 
Published on March 19, 2013, in Healthcare.

ObamacareHurtIt’s worth remembering that President Obama decided not to let his new ObamaCare scheme take effect until 2014. At the time of its passage in 2010, it seemed politically wise to delay its implementation. Republicans won the election of 2010 and lost that of 2012. But the full impact of the new law will begin to become apparent in 2014 and the effect will be horrific, deeply damaging the Obama administration and the Democrats who backed it.

 The main brunt of the impact will be on premiums for health insurance coverage. They will skyrocket in very short order. The Heritage Foundation estimates the increases by state. Here’s a sample:

 
Published on March 1, 2013, in Uncategorized.
eagle_bill_of_rightsThe Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on S.115 (“South Carolina Constitutional Carry Act of 2013″) will hold public hearings around the state at the locations and dates below. The subcommittee members are Senators Bright (Ch), Hutto, Malloy, S. Martin, and Hembree. J. J. Gentry is the staff attorney for this bill.

The Senate Judiciary Committee subcommittee will be holding meetings regarding S. 115 in Columbia, South Carolina, following the public hearings. The public hearings are intended to give those who live in other areas of South Carolina and who cannot travel to Columbia an opportunity to speak to the subcommittee. Midlands residents will have an opportunity to speak at one or more of the subcommittee meetings in Columbia.

Monday, March 18, 2013
7:00 – 9:00 p.m.
Ted C. Collins Law Enforcement Center
Council Chambers
1101 North Oaks Street
Myrtle Beach, S.C. 29577

There will be a sign in sheet outside or just inside the chambers. On it, you will need to include your information and check off whether you would like to speak. There will be an additional check off to be added to the contact list. Once the hearing begins, the Chairman will begin calling people forward to speak. Speakers will be called in the order of the sign in sheet. Please do not walk up to the microphone before being called forward. We also do not sign up speakers prior to the event.

Depending on the number of people that would like to provide testimony, there may be a limited amount of time for each speaker. You are welcome to provide written testimony to the subcommittee, but please bring at least six copies for the members and staff.

They held a meeting in Charleston several days ago and 175 citizens attended. If you want to protect your 2nd Amendment and want to ask your Representatives questions, please attend this public hearing.  Even if you don’t wish to speak, numbers matter and having a huge turnout is critical.

Additionally, our own Senator Hembree (Horry District 28) needs to hear from us.  He is most probably the swing vote on this 5 person sub-committee.  You can call him at (803) 212-6016 or email him at greghembree@scsenate.gov
Respectfully,
Ron Hughes

MBTP Legislative Watch committe

 

CruzTexas Sen. Ted Cruz says some of the attacks on fellow Republican Sen. Marco Rubio by Democrats are motivated by race, according to the Dallas Morning News.

“I think Democrats and the media are afraid of Marco Rubio because he is a smart, intelligent, conservative Hispanic,” Cruz told reporters Tuesday while touring a Texas gun manufacturing plant.

“And they are looking for any excuse they can to attack him, because that threatens them.”

Cruz also commented on the criticism Rubio received following his response to last week’s State of the Union, suggesting it was about more than Rubio being a promising young Republican.

“It’s not just a promising Republican,” Cruz said. “I think the Democrats view Marco Rubio as a particular threat because of his background, his life story. I think it they believe it is in their interest to inflict as much damage as possible and blow things wildly out of proportion.”

Newsday ran a Cal Thomas column Monday, “Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, a double threat,” that looks at why Democrats fear the Hispanic senators:

After becoming the first Hispanic to win a Senate seat in Texas, Cruz told CBS News, “I think the values in the Hispanic community are fundamentally conservative, but you’ve got to have candidates that connect with that community in a real and genuine way and communicate that the values between the candidate and the community are one and the same.”

This is what Cruz and Rubio are doing. They don’t use their heritage as a wedge to divide; rather they are using it as an avenue for communicating ideas to those who share that heritage — and to a wider audience — in ways that can improve everyone’s life.

“Democrats aren’t likely to sit still and allow Cruz and Rubio’s ideas to reach not only Hispanics, but the rest of America,” Thomas wrote.

“Their ideas are more powerful than the weapons used by Democrats in their race and class warfare where people are seen not as individuals, but as voting blocs.”

Cruz also weighed in on immigration reform: “In my opinion, the single biggest obstacle to passing immigration reform right now is President Barack Obama… His objective is not to get a deal, not to pass a serious improvement to our immigration system, but rather to force Republicans to walk away from the table so he can have a political issue to campaign on in 2014 and 2016.”

 

Shape-tomorrow

President David Barton and Restore America said only about half of evangelical Christians registered to vote ever go to the polls, meaning some 58 million let others decide the nation’s future for them.

So the drive to get them registered and get them to the polls – even during primaries – is heating up. Barton also has put together what he says is a Christian voter guide.

“The difference with this effort is that we are encouraging people to start registering now and to have their voice heard in the primary and in the general [election],” Barton said. “We’ve never really pushed getting involved in the process early. We feel that’s vital; that’s something that has to be done.”

Barton is one of many evangelicals who urge Christians to get involved in the political process, a detail that has drawn criticism. Institute for First Amendment Studies commentator Rob Boston previously accused the Christian Coalition of supporting the Republican Party.

The website Theocracy Watch also asserts that the Republican Party has been taken over by the Christian Right and some in the GOP are now working to establish a theocracy, a state governed by clerics by “divine commission” institution.

Bunk, Barton says.

“From my standpoint, I don’t care [about political party links]. There’s not a thing in any of our releases that ever say vote Republican, vote Democrat, vote independent, vote Green, vote Constitution Party, Reform Party, whatever,” Barton said.

“There were 17 political parties on the ballot last time; there were 17 political parties on the election before. What we are interested in is people turning out and voting,” Barton said.

Barton said his group encourages citizens to obtain voter guides but doesn’t tell them which one to use.

“They may get one from the Chamber of Commerce; they may get one from NARAL,” Barton said. “What we want are people to be registered to vote.”

Barton said that he’s personally endorsed both Republicans and Democrats. He emphasized that his focus is on whether the candidate represents the pro-life, pro-faith and pro-family positions.

He acknowledged that the GOP more closely aligns with those positions.

“In the years past the Senate, only 15 percent of the Democrats voted for the marriage amendment as marriage is a man and woman; only 13 percent of the Democrats voted for it in the House. Eighty-five percent of the Senate Republicans voted for the amendment and 87 percent in the House,” Barton said.

Barton said that the percentages were similar for the Ten Commandments Display Act and measures allowing voluntary prayer before football games.

“I’m not the one who casts the votes, those are individuals lining themselves up with a certain philosophy. We keep track of the measures coming through Congress,” Barton said.

“I would love to see 85 percent of the Democrats support pro-life, pro-faith and pro-family bills, but it doesn’t happen,” he said.

Voter registration drives usually are launched to bring new people into the process and to encourage voter participation. On the side of left-leaning constituents, a voter drive by ACORN resulted in the organization being charged with voter fraud.

The group was accused of setting quotas, requiring employees to turn in at least 20 completed registrations in order to keep their jobs. ACORN also was alleged to have run a “Blackjack 21″ program giving workers an extra $5 per day if they had 21 registrations.

The Las Vegas Review Journal reported that Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto said ACORN’s actions were clearly illegal.

“In Nevada, it is unlawful for a person to provide compensation for registering voters that is based on the total number of voters a person registers,” Masto said. “These practices are clearly a violation of Nevada law.”

The Chicago Sun-Times reported in 2008 that ACORN ran a national voter registration drive and although officially “non-partisan,” Sun-Times Washington correspondent Lynn Sweet said there was a pro-Obama slant to ACORN’s effort.

“Though officially non-partisan, the focus of the ACORN/Project Vote voter drive was on groups leaning Democratic in the presidential contest: African American, young, Latino and low income earners. They are called ‘historically underrepresented in elections’ in a press release issued by the group… Republicans would call these target groups Democrats,” Sweet wrote.

“ACORN/Project Vote ran voter registration operations in 21 states; included are the battlegrounds Colorado, Florida, Michigan (since move to Obama) Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin,” Sweet also said.

The state of Virginia has off-year statewide elections and Virginia Planned Parenthood had a program that encouraged Planned Parenthood supporters to register to vote.

The Virginia Planned Parenthood website provided information on where voter registration forms could be located and the voter eligibility requirements.

“Virginia is holding statewide elections this year, which means that every seat in the General Assembly (all 140 of them) are up for grabs. Please see the information below on how to register to vote, voter registration deadlines, and general election information,” the website said.

Barton said that when evangelical Christians vote, their votes make a major difference.

“We’ve done this for 20 years, and when evangelical voter turnout goes up, and they vote their values, not their pocketbook, it has a massive impact on the caliber of the folks who get elected and the types of candidates that run,” Barton said.

“The easiest example was the 2010 election. It was the highest evangelical turnout on recorded totals. Instead of averaging 23 and 25 percent in the election, which is what we usually do, it was up to 30 percent in that election,” Barton said.

“As a result, we have the highest number of pro-life, pro-faith, pro-family folks elected to the legislatures, state and federal, of any previous election,” Barton said.

Barton said there has been a tangible result in what has come from the statehouses in this legislative session.

“We have 80 pro-life bills that have passed this year out of these new legislatures. The highest previous record for any year was 34 pieces of pro-life legislation,” Barton said.

“So we’ve tripled that in one election because we had a high turnout because we looked at a high percentage of new freshman at the federal level. There were 97 total new freshman Republicans and Democrats. And of that, 81 percent of those new representatives were pro-life, pro-faith, pro-family,” Barton said.

“There were 16 freshman senators and 13 of the 16 were pro-life, pro-faith and pro-family. You’re looking at about 75 percent in the Senate and 81 percent in the House,” Barton said.

“That 75 percent in the Senate didn’t get the majority, but it moved the Senate in the pro-life direction,” Barton said.

The impact of a heavy evangelical voter turnout was also reflected in the results in the statehouses.

“Minnesota for the first time in its history has a pro-life governor, senate and house. Mississippi this past election, for the first time, pro-life governor, senate and house,” Barton said.

“They voted their values, they got legislators who will fight for their values and they got more legislation passed in one election than they have at any previous election,” Barton said.

What happened during 2008? Barton believes Christians became worried about the economy and voted their pocketbooks.

“We had high evangelical voter turnout, the highest of any presidential election, but of that group, only three percent of the evangelicals thought that marriage was important and only six percent thought that life was an important issue,” Barton said. “Most of them voted their billfold and that’s the difference.”

Barton said only about half of evangelical Christians registered to vote ever go to the polls, meaning some 58 million let others decide the nation’s future for them.

So the drive to get them registered and get them to the polls – even during primaries – is heating up. Barton also has put together what he says is a Christian voter guide.

“The difference with this effort is that we are encouraging people to start registering now and to have their voice heard in the primary and in the general [election],” Barton said. “We’ve never really pushed getting involved in the process early. We feel that’s vital; that’s something that has to be done.”

Barton is one of many evangelicals who urge Christians to get involved in the political process, a detail that has drawn criticism. Institute for First Amendment Studies commentator Rob Boston previously accused the Christian Coalition of supporting the Republican Party.

The website Theocracy Watch also asserts that the Republican Party has been taken over by the Christian Right and some in the GOP are now working to establish a theocracy, a state governed by clerics by “divine commission” institution.

Bunk, Barton says.

“From my standpoint, I don’t care [about political party links]. There’s not a thing in any of our releases that ever say vote Republican, vote Democrat, vote independent, vote Green, vote Constitution Party, Reform Party, whatever,” Barton said.

What we are interested in is people turning out and voting,” Barton said.

Barton said his group encourages citizens to obtain voter guides but doesn’t tell them which one to use.

“They may get one from the Chamber of Commerce; they may get one from NARAL,” Barton said. “What we want are people to be registered to vote.”

Barton said that he’s personally endorsed both Republicans and Democrats. He emphasized that his focus is on whether the candidate represents the pro-life, pro-faith and pro-family positions.

He acknowledged that the GOP more closely aligns with those positions.

“In the Senate, only 15 percent of the Democrats voted for the marriage amendment as marriage is a man and woman; only 13 percent of the Democrats voted for it in the House. Eighty-five percent of the Senate Republicans voted for the amendment and 87 percent in the House,” Barton said.

Barton said that the percentages were similar for the Ten Commandments Display Act and measures allowing voluntary prayer before football games.

“I’m not the one who casts the votes, those are individuals lining themselves up with a certain philosophy. We keep track of the measures coming through Congress,” Barton said.

“I would love to see 85 percent of the Democrats support pro-life, pro-faith and pro-family bills, but it doesn’t happen,” he said.

Voter registration drives usually are launched to bring new people into the process and to encourage voter participation. On the side of left-leaning constituents, a voter drive by ACORN resulted in the organization being charged with voter fraud.

The group was accused of setting quotas, requiring employees to turn in at least 20 completed registrations in order to keep their jobs. ACORN also was alleged to have run a “Blackjack 21″ program giving workers an extra $5 per day if they had 21 registrations.

“In Nevada, it is unlawful for a person to provide compensation for registering voters that is based on the total number of voters a person registers,” Masto said. “These practices are clearly a violation of Nevada law.”

The Chicago Sun-Times reported in 2008 that ACORN ran a national voter registration drive and although officially “non-partisan,” Sun-Times Washington correspondent Lynn Sweet said there was a pro-Obama slant to ACORN’s effort.

“Though officially non-partisan, the focus of the ACORN/Project Vote voter drive was on groups leaning Democratic in the presidential contest: African American, young, Latino and low income earners. They are called ‘historically underrepresented in elections’ in a press release issued by the group… Republicans would call these target groups Democrats,” Sweet wrote.

“ACORN/Project Vote ran voter registration operations in 21 states; included are the battlegrounds Colorado, Florida, Michigan (since move to Obama) Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin,” Sweet also said.

The state of Virginia has off-year statewide elections and Virginia Planned Parenthood had a program that encouraged Planned Parenthood supporters to register to vote.

The Virginia Planned Parenthood website provided information on where voter registration forms could be located and the voter eligibility requirements.

“Virginia is holding statewide elections this year, which means that every seat in the General Assembly (all 140 of them) are up for grabs. Please see the information below on how to register to vote, voter registration deadlines, and general election information,” the website said.

Barton said that when evangelical Christians vote, their votes make a major difference.

“We’ve done this for 20 years, and when evangelical voter turnout goes up, and they vote their values, not their pocketbook, it has a massive impact on the caliber of the folks who get elected and the types of candidates that run,” Barton said.

“The easiest example was the 2010 election. It was the highest evangelical turnout on recorded totals. Instead of averaging 23 and 25 percent in the election, which is what we usually do, it was up to 30 percent in that election,” Barton said.

“As a result, we have the highest number of pro-life, pro-faith, pro-family folks elected to the legislatures, state and federal, of any previous election,” Barton said.

Barton said there has been a tangible result in what has come from the statehouses in this legislative session.

“We have 80 pro-life bills that have passed this year out of these new legislatures. The highest previous record for any year was 34 pieces of pro-life legislation,” Barton said.

“So we’ve tripled that in one election because we had a high turnout because we looked at a high percentage of new freshman at the federal level. There were 97 total new freshman Republicans and Democrats. And of that, 81 percent of those new representatives were pro-life, pro-faith, pro-family,” Barton said.

“There were 16 freshman senators and 13 of the 16 were pro-life, pro-faith and pro-family. You’re looking at about 75 percent in the Senate and 81 percent in the House,” Barton said.

“That 75 percent in the Senate didn’t get the majority, but it moved the Senate in the pro-life direction,” Barton said.

The impact of a heavy evangelical voter turnout was also reflected in the results in the statehouses.

“Minnesota for the first time in its history has a pro-life governor, senate and house. Mississippi this past election, for the first time, pro-life governor, senate and house,” Barton said.

“They voted their values, they got legislators who will fight for their values and they got more legislation passed in one election than they have at any previous election,” Barton said.

What happened during 2008? Barton believes Christians became worried about the economy and voted their pocketbooks.

“We had high evangelical voter turnout, the highest of any presidential election, but of that group, only three percent of the evangelicals thought that marriage was important and only six percent thought that life was an important issue,” Barton said. “Most of them voted their billfold and that’s the difference.”

The time is now for precinct reorg and let’s get this country turned around!

 

 
Published on February 22, 2013, in Tea Party.

conservativesBy DAVID ESPO — AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON — Twice burned, Republicans are treading carefully around tea party groups as they pursue a Senate majority that slipped through their fingers in 2010 and 2012.

“You’d have to be an idiot not to prepare” for primary election challenges from the right, no matter the state, says Rob Jesmer, who was executive director of the GOP Senate campaign committee when flawed, conservative candidates captured primaries, only to lose winnable races in the fall.

While incumbents work to ward off or repel challenges from within their party, a Republican tempest already is flaring in Georgia, where GOP Sen. Saxby Chambliss is stepping down. Party officials also look apprehensively toward Iowa, where Sen. Tom Harkin’s decision to retire down opens up a seat long in Democratic hands.

The developments come at a time the Republican Party nationally is involved in a well-chronicled period of introspection after failing to win the White House last fall. President Barack Obama’s support reached 53 percent among women who cast ballots, 60 percent among voters under 30, some 71 percent among Hispanics and 93 percent among blacks. Numerous officials have said the party must find a way to broaden its appeal rather than continue to steer rightward.

Brad Dayspring, a spokesman for Republicans, said consternation about a replay of recent politically damaging primaries “at least for the moment, doesn’t seem to be an issue” for the GOP. Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas, who chairs the campaign committee, declined a request for an interview.

Yet the divisions that pit the party establishment against insurgents and self-styled grass-roots groups show no signs of abating.

Karl Rove, a prominent strategist with deep ties to the Republican establishment, recently disclosed creation of a Conservative Victory Fund with the stated goal of backing electable conservatives in party primaries.

But when Rep. Tom Price of Georgia, a longtime conservative and possible Senate contender, was quoted in the National Review as saying he didn’t oppose the objectives espoused by Rove’s group, he drew a slap from a rival organization with close tea party ties.

“The Republican establishment is becoming increasingly hostile to the conservative movement, and Congressman Price should openly and aggressively oppose their efforts, not defend them,” blogged Matt Hoskins, head of the Senate Conservatives Fund, an organization founded by former South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint.

Price’s office declined comment.

Steven Law, head of the Conservative Victory Fund, said it was too early to predict which races it would become involved in. He said the organization hopes to “work with other groups that share that mission to see if we can ensure more rigorous evaluation of candidates, find consensus where possible and perhaps most importantly prevent the Democrats from picking our nominees for us.”

Incumbent Republicans seem eager to avoid antagonizing groups that have helped elect tea party favorites such as Sens. Mike Lee in Utah, Rand Paul in Kentucky, Marco Rubio in Florida and Ted Cruz in Texas in recent years.

Even before the beginning of the year, the party’s Senate leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, hired the campaign manager who guided Paul to his establishment-upending victory in 2010.

The party’s second-ranking leader, Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, was one of only three Senate Republicans to oppose John Kerry’s confirmation as secretary of state. He has said he expects a primary challenge and Democrats recently accused him of being on “Cruz control,” as he seeks a new term.

Megan Mitchell, a spokeswoman for Cornyn disputed the claim while stressing the second-term lawmaker “is proud to have Ted Cruz in the Senate.”

Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a veteran senator with an independent streak, has been at the forefront of efforts to derail several of Obama’s high-level nominees. He is preparing to face voters in a state where the tea party has notched numerous triumphs.

In all, Republicans must gain six seats to win a majority in the 100-member Senate in 2014, and can ill afford the sort of turmoil that led to unexpected defeats in Nevada, Colorado and Delaware in 2010 and in Missouri and Indiana last year.

In four of those races, tea party-based insurgents defeated establishment candidates for the party nomination, only to lose the general election. In Missouri, then-Rep. Todd Akin won his primary with an assist from Democrats, then lost in the fall after saying women’s bodies were able to avoid pregnancy in cases of “legitimate rape.”

The promising news for Republicans is that Democrats must defend 21 of the 35 Senate seats on the ballot next year. Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, Montana and North Carolina are among them, states that Obama lost and where incumbents will be seeking new terms.

Much of the early attention has focused on Iowa and Georgia.

Georgia last elected a Democrat to the Senate nearly two decades ago, and the party is in search of a top-rank contender. At the same time, officials claim renewed interest.

Among Republicans, Rep. Paul Broun has announced he will run, and Price and other members of the state’s delegation are also considering candidacies.

All are conservatives, although Broun in particular has drawn attention for some of his remarks since coming to Congress five years ago.

He has said that evolution and the Big Bang theory are “lies straight from the pit of hell,” and said before Obama took office he feared the then president-elect would establish a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist dictatorship.

Broun’s target voters are plain as he embarks on his statewide campaign. In a poke at potential primary challengers, his campaign website says that since 2007 the congressman has sponsored “more legislation to reduce federal spending that any other member of Congress from Georgia.” It adds he has never voted to raise taxes or the government debt ceiling, never supported earmarks, opposed all bailout deals and authored a balanced budget amendment.

In Iowa, a political swing state, public opinion polls indicate Republican Rep. Tom Latham would be the stronger Republican candidate in a fall matchup with Rep. Bruce Braley, the only announced Democrat so far.

But early surveys also suggest a second Republican, Rep. Steve King has an advantage among potential primary voters.

Latham is a low-key congressional veteran, a close friend of Speaker John Boehner and the chairman of an Appropriations Committee panel that sets spending for transportation programs.

With an outspoken style, King is best known for his strenuous opposition to citizenship for illegal immigrants and his penchant for incendiary remarks.

Neither man has announced plans to run, but King has staked out his ground.

“I’m no stranger to outlandish attacks like this,” he said in an emailed request for donations after officials with Rove’s group cited some of his past comments as possibly problematic.

“Nobody can bully me out of running for the U.S. Senate, not even Karl Rove and his hefty war chest.”

Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/02/21/2642995/gop-senators-are-treading-carefully.html#storylink=rss#storylink=cpy
 
Published on February 22, 2013, in Washington.
 Larry Ward and Carter Clews | World Tribune

Karl Rove has declared war on the conservative wing of the GOP, and the Republican Party now risks being reduced to rubble.

This is yet another in a series of internecine conflagrations that a certain segment of the party insists on reigniting every decade, or so, like profligate pyromaniacs.

At one time, these provocateurs were labeled “Rockefeller Republicans.” After Rocky’s untimely (and unseemly) demise, they became known as “Country Club Republicans.” More recently, they earned the pejorative “RINO,” as in “Republicans In Name Only.”
Now, they are reviled on the right as “Rove Republicans.”

Rove Republicans are typical of the breed of Republican politicos who seems to think the only way to gain and maintain power is to become a mirror image of Democrats — even if (or, perhaps, more accurately, especially if) it requires vivisecting fellow Republicans who insist upon remaining loyal to traditional Grand Old Party principles.

For Karl Rove, this means torching any Republican candidate who dares depart from his left-of-center, middle-of-nowhere ideology.

As one conservative GOP flag bearer after another has learned to their dismay, failing to genuflect to Karl causes a bulls-eye to appear in the center of your forehead (or, more likely, the middle of your back).

ForAmerica Chairman L. Brent Bozell III stated in The National Journal: “The days of conservatives listening to the moderate GOP establishment are over.”

While Rove’s recent declaration of open warfare is his most flagrant bombshell to date, it’s far from his first.

Perhaps, the earliest indication that the post-White House Rove intended to try to remake the Republican Party in his own elfin image came just before Sarah Palin’s acceptance speech at the 2008 GOP convention.

Rove undermined Gov. Palin’s as McCain’s running mate stating “[Palin was] not a governing decision but a campaign decision” suggesting that she could not have been selected on her merits of strong conservative principles, since they didn’t agree with his.

Karl Rove opened the door to the left’s “caricature assassination” of Sarah Palin that has plagued her ever since.

 
Published on February 21, 2013, in Washington.

obama_1“We don’t want to become a party in which a handful of political bosses gather up money from billionaires in order to destroy the candidates they don’t like,” Newt Gingrich said on CBS “This Morning,” explaining his opposition to Rove’s strategy. “I think this is a very dangerous model. Last year we lost nine political races that we could have won. There’s some very deep rethinking we need to do as a party, but it isn’t gathering up more money by Washington consultants.”

“A lot of our consultants are frankly just kidding themselves about how big the gap is. The Obama campaign today is about eight years or 10 years ahead of the Republican Party in very fundamental effort to understand the country. This is a country which is in many ways younger, more Latino, more Asian-American, more African-American than Republican strategists are capable of dealing with,” Gingrich said.

“As a result. We’re going to be non-competitive at the presidential level. We’re doing great with governors. We have 30 governors with 315 electoral votes, but we’re not doing well at the presidential level,” he added.

 
Published on February 21, 2013, in Activistism.
TWO SOUTH CAROLINA CONGRESSMEN – Larry Grooms FOR CONGRESS

Duncan, “Larry Grooms Has The Record, Values and Conviction Best Suited to Represent the Lowcountry in Congress.”
Mulvaney, “Larry’s Record is One We Know And Trust.”

Charleston, SC – Today, the Grooms for Congress campaign received two coveted conservative endorsements when South Carolina’s 3rd District Congressman Jeff Duncan and South Carolina’s 5th District Congressman announced their endorsement of Larry Grooms for Congress.

South Carolina’s Congressman from the 3rd District Jeff Duncan said:

“South Carolina’s Congressional Delegation is known across the country and in Washington for being a united voice for conservatism. In fact, we’ve earned a reputation of working together, standing on principle and protecting South Carolina values. It’s important to ensure that the person who replaces Tim Scott be a reliable conservative, a proven fighter and a leader who will join our mission to cut wasteful Washington spending.

I’m convinced the best person for the job is Larry Grooms.

While there are several good candidates in the 1st Congressional race, Larry Grooms has the record, values, and conviction best suited to represent the Lowcountry in Congress. I’ve known Larry for years and worked with him in Columbia at the Statehouse. Together, we fought for conservative reforms and I know Larry both as a man of faith and as a conservative leader. Like myself, Larry comes from a small business background, and knows what its like to sign the front of a check, write a budget and limit wasteful spending to keep that budget balanced.

Larry is also a strong defender of the 2nd amendment. His “Firearms Liberty Act” recognizes the uniquely American right to bear arms even as our President and many in congress try to limit that right. If South Carolina sends Larry Grooms to Washington, we’d have an ally we could depend on to fight President Obama’s agenda, and help us restore the American dream to all South Carolinians. Larry will be ready on day one to pick up where Tim Scott left off and be key member of our team.

During my short time in Washington, I’ve learned that when it comes to electing your representative, it’s not enough to simply have an “R” by your name. We need someone we can count on to hold the Republican Party accountable to conservative principles and follow our Founding Fathers’ example. I’m convinced Larry Grooms is the best person for this job. I hope you’ll join me, Congressman Mulvaney, and conservatives all across the 1st District in supporting Larry Grooms for Congress.”

South Carolina’s Congressman from the 5th district Mick Mulvaney said:

“When I heard that Tim Scott’s congressional seat had opened up, I was excited for Tim, South Carolina and the US Senate. But Tim’s open Congressional seat left me with some serious questions. Who would fill Tim’s conservative shoes in the 1st District and pick up where Tim left off? When Larry Grooms announced for Congress – those questions were answered with a strong credentialed conservative. I know Larry well and I’ve worked with him on several issues when we served together in the state senate. Larry’s brand of conservatism, leadership and strength will serve South Carolina and the 1st District well in Congress.”

“Conservatives like Jeff and I need Larry to stand with us on the most important issues facing our country today. When it comes to reducing taxes, cutting wasteful Washington spending and protecting our liberties, I believe Larry Grooms is the right man for the job. Larry has been in the trenches, and he has proven his conservative credentials in the state senate. We want Larry on our team. While there are many good candidates in the field – Larry’s record is one we know and trust. He will go to Washington and protect South Carolina from day one.”

Congressional candidate and State Senator Larry Grooms said:

“I’m truly honored and greatly humbled by Jeff and Mick’s endorsement. It means so much, especially in a crowded primary, for sitting Congressmen to come forward and support our campaign. Jeff and Mick realize Washington is spends too much money and they fight every day to cut spending, lower taxes and defend our liberties. And when I’m elected to Congress, Jeff, Mick and I will join together and present a united conservative voice to cut wasteful Washington spending and protect South Carolina values. This is a great day for our campaign – and I’m blessed to receive Jeff and Mick’s support.”

###

J. Hogan Gidley
hogan@brabendercox.com
Twitter: @JHoganGidley
Senior Political Advisor
BrabenderCox
www.brabendercox.com
(703) 896-5300